We are all Jews!
By R. James Woolsey, Special to
With anti-Semitism growing in Europe and a hideous variety thereof already
metastasized in the Middle East - not to speak of the Left's (and a small
part of the Right's) hostility to Israel which sometimes veers off into
anti-Semitism - it seems to me Israel could use a bit of solidarity these
days. The sixtieth anniversary of the independence of the State of Israel
seems as good a time as any to explain why. This concept is at the heart of what makes decently- governed societies possible, whether you sign on to Jefferson's formulation that we are "endowed by our Creator" with basic rights or prefer the more secular notion of natural law. In the absence of one or the other of these bases for the notion that the rule of law somehow derives from a source above the rulers, electoral democracy can degenerate into mob rule and capitalism into theft. This supremacy of the law is what most Americans mean when they say that we have a "government of laws, not men." Some aspects of this have gotten a bit muddled recently in the largely
academic debate about whether the United States is or is not an "empire." If
the US is an empire it's a very odd one: Countries where it has troops
such as Saudi Arabia, South Korea, and Germany suggest they are unhappy
about that and the response is, "OK," and offer to leave. |
![]() |
| R. James Woolsey was Director of Central Intelligence. He is currently vice-president of Booz, Allen, Hamilton and co-chair of the Committee on the Present Danger. | |
| Nero and Napoleon would have been appalled. They would also have had a hard time understanding the travails of Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton. One was driven from office by the people's elected representatives for permitting a cover-up of a clumsy political burglary. The other was impeached by the House, then acquitted in a Senate trial, for lying under oath in a deposition taken in what was essentially a sexual harassment case brought by a private citizen. | |
What, you may well ask, are the most powerful individuals in the world doing,
if they are emperors, getting held to account by members of Congress for burglary
cover-ups and by private citizens, no less, for sexual behavior?
The answer is, of course, that neither Nixon nor Clinton, indeed no American
president, is even close to being an emperor. People (and smaller nations wherein
an empire maintains troops) obey emperors, if they know what's good for them,
without much discussion. These two recent presidents were, instead, held to account
in a distinctly non-imperial way - in pretty much the same way Elijah humbled
Ahab for allowing his queen, Jezebel, to frame and execute Naboth and steal his
vineyard, and in the way the prophet Nathan confronted David over his taking
Bathsheba and ordering her husband, Uriah, to the front lines and certain death.
The US does not look back to Rome or France at the height of their power in determining
the way to deal with those who today govern the most powerful nation in history.
Thankfully, in regard to the powerful being subjected to the rule of law we are,
instead, all Jews. Perhaps nothing more distinguishes the free world, with Israel
as its frontline family member, from the Islamist fundamentalism that challenges
it as its greatest existential threat.
I've mainly been in synagogues for the bar mitzvas and bat mitzvas of friends'
children. The next time you are, notice what the object of veneration is - it
is the Torah, the law itself. At a point in the service it is carried, lovingly,
around the congregation, greeted as an old friend. I am convinced that it is
this veneration of the law - with its status above the ruler - that is at the
heart of anti-Semitism.
Jews have almost always been the first target of tyrants, because their beliefs
and religious practices, honed by nearly two millennia in Diaspora, clearly declare
that in their view the law is above the ruler: dietary laws, the dress of the
Orthodox, a propensity to contend about what is a fair interpretation of rules,
all stamp Jews with this belief's being the heart of their history and religion.
As a consequence they are often the first group that tyrants, secular or theocratic,
feel they must suppress or destroy.
We should all reflect upon the historic reality that when anti- Semitism raises
its head, the rest of us, unless we are willing to live with a foot on our neck,
will be the next targets.
Jewish humor, a distinctive barrier against any propensity to self-righteousness,
permeates American culture. A number of times during the Cold War, I was involved
in arms control negotiations with the Soviets. No matter how bad the tension
across the negotiating table during the day, Russian and American negotiators
would often end up going out for dinner together. Somehow, even in the most difficult
periods, the conversation frequently turned to trading jokes.
I always thought it remarkable how much Russian humor was suffused with a wry,
self-deprecating, ironic tone both quite funny and somehow quite familiar to
Americans. Later, finding versions of a number of these jokes and stories in
Leo Rosten's wonderful The Joys of Yiddish, I realized the source of the familiarity.
Six years ago the Immigration and Naturalization Service imprisoned eight Muslims,
Iraqi freedom fighters who were refugees from Saddam, for allegedly being security
threats to the US. The government's case was worse than flimsy but it was protected
by rules regarding secret evidence. After a long struggle all eight were freed,
and several are now working to establish democracy in Iraq.
I was one of their lawyers. The majority of my co- counsel, all acting pro
bono, were Jewish. The law is, after all, above the ruler. At the same time
that fidelity to this concept is the greatest irritant to Israel’s enemies,it
is precisely that fidelity that will not only sustain the Jewish state but
will guarantee that it will survive and thrive as a valued ally in the family
of free nations.